TY - JOUR AU - Nazeer, Asghar AU - Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A. PY - 2011/12/05 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus metrics for patients in Saudi Arabia JF - The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries JA - J Infect Dev Ctries VL - 6 IS - 03 SE - Regional Reviews DO - 10.3855/jidc.2249 UR - https://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/22421603 SP - 223-233 AB - <p>Introduction: The World Health Organization recommends essential measures to "combat drug resistance", including instituting surveillance "everywhere". Standardized metrics are crucial for reliable surveillance. Studies publish metrics with varying definitions for multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) proposed standardized metrics for MDRO for consistent reporting, identifying high-risk groups, and evaluating interventions.</p> <p>Methodology: We retrieved 73 studies through PubMed using the search terms "methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>", "MRSA", and "Saudi Arabia". We selected 20 studies that reported MRSA incidence or prevalence in patients and/or percentage among <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> isolates and evaluated these metrics against the closest matching SHEA/HICPAC metrics.</p> <p>Results: We outlined issues applicable to MRSA metrics such as comparison of risk-unadjusted metrics; their pooling for different hospitals; not accounting for post-discharge infections; non-specification of AST-based, and healthcare and community associated infections' related, standardized metrics by SHEA/HICPAC; and appropriate temporal criteria for nosocomial infections. We elaborated salient features of reviewed metrics versus their SHEA/HICPAC complements. Terminology and definitions of reviewed metrics differed from SHEA/HICPAC counterparts. Some did not satisfy the epidemiological or statistical criteria for their reported category; e.g. prevalence indicators were classified as incidence and vice versa.</p> <p>Conclusions: SHEA/HICPAC metrics would be useful for future studies. Our results show an imminent need for an international consensus on fundamental MDRO surveillance metrics; illustrate surveillance scenarios requiring standardized metrics; identify some indicators from Saudi studies supplementing SHEA/HICPAC metrics; and underscore SHEA/HICPAC's advice for avoiding comparison of risk-unadjusted metrics between hospitals.</p> ER -