A randomized clinical trial comparing safety, clinical and parasitological response to artemether-lumefantrine and chlorproguanil-dapsone in treatment of uncomplicated malaria in pregnancy in Mulago hospital, Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.285Keywords:
Artemether-Lumefantrine, Chlorproguanil-Dapsone, Malaria, uncomplicated malaria, pregnancyAbstract
Background: Malaria infection during pregnancy is a major public health problem. Due to increasing resistance to Chloroquine and Sulphadoxine/Pyrimethamine, the Ugandan national policy on malaria treatment was changed in 2005 to Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria. The policy recommends assessment of safety and efficacy of alternative drugs for treatment of uncomplicated malaria. We compared the efficacy and safety of Artemether-Lumefantrine (Coartem®) and Chlorproguanil-Dapsone (Lapdap®) in the management of uncomplicated malaria in pregnancy. Methodology: We enrolled 110 pregnant women in the second and third trimester of pregnancy who presented to Mulago hospital, Uganda, with uncomplicated malaria. The study design was an open-label randomized clinical trial. Participants were randomized to receive either Artemether-Lumefantrine (Coartem® 20mg/120mg) orally or Chlorproguanil-Dapsone (Lapdap®) orally for 3 consecutive days. Primary endpoints were clinical and parasitological response assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 14 and 28. Adverse effects, clinical response (treatment failure) and parasitological response were compared. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results: Of the 100 women who completed the study, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical and parasitological response by Day 4. The mean fever clearance time 3.0 days with Lapdap® versus 2.5 days with Coartem® was comparable. Likewise, mean parasite clearance time of 2.4 and 2.2 days for Lapdap® and Coartem® respectively was comparable. The adverse effects were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Artemether-Lumefantrine and Chlorproguanil-Dapsone have high and comparable cure rates and similar safety profiles when used for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in pregnancy.
Downloads
Published
2008-04-01
How to Cite
1.
Kaye DK, Nshemerirwe R, Mutyaba TS, Ndeezi G (2008) A randomized clinical trial comparing safety, clinical and parasitological response to artemether-lumefantrine and chlorproguanil-dapsone in treatment of uncomplicated malaria in pregnancy in Mulago hospital, Uganda. J Infect Dev Ctries 2:135–139. doi: 10.3855/jidc.285
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
