Investigation of clonal relationships of K. pneumoniae isolates from neonatal intensive care units by PFGE and rep-PCR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.6326Keywords:
K. pneumoniae, clonal relationship, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, repetitive PCR, epidemic, neonatal intensive care unitAbstract
Introduction: Clonal relationships of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains obtained during an epidemic and after a one-year post-epidemic (non-epidemic) period in the same neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and repetitive polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) by the DiversiLab (DL) system were investigated, and the results of both molecular techniques were evaluated.
Methodology: Fifteen K. pneumoniae strains were included in this study. All identified bacterial strains were confirmed by 16S rDNA sequencing and analyzed by PFGE and the DL system.
Results: According to the PFGE results, 15 isolates showed 10 different band profiles. Nine of these 15 isolates were included in one of the formed clusters, and the remaining six isolates were not included in any of them. According to the DL system results, 15 isolates showed two different clusters, with three strains in one cluster and four strains in the other. The remaining strains could not be placed any one of the clusters. PFGE was used as the gold standard based on its strong genetic discriminatory power. The DL system results showed that PFGE missed the relationship of the two epidemic-related strains and demonstrated one epidemic-unrelated strain to be epidemic related.
Conclusions: Both systems may easily be used for clonal relationships of K. pneumoniae strains. The DL system was clearly more rapid and convenient than PFGE, but its discriminatory power seemed to be inferior to that of PFGE based on 15 K. pneumoniae strains.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
