Computed tomography findings in COVID-19 and atypical pneumonia: a comparative study

Authors

  • Esra Çıvgın Department of Radiology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4790-3146
  • İzzet Selçuk Parlak Department of Radiology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-7399
  • Yasin Celal Güneş Department of Radiology, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • Gülsüm Kübra Bahadır Department of Radiology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-9372
  • Ayşegül Karalezli Department of Pulmoner Medicine, Yıldırım Beyazıt University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-4061

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.16698

Keywords:

atypical pneumonia, computed tomography, COVID-19

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) has an important role in the rapid diagnosis, treatment, and management of lower respiratory tract infections. This study aimed to explore different imaging characteristics between Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and atypical pneumonia (non-COVID-19) on chest CT of patients admitted to the emergency department.

Methodology: CT features of 120 patients with positive Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 83 patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR but positive respiratory tract sample test results for other respiratory pathogens were retrospectively evaluated, findings were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results: Compared to non-COVID-19, COVID-19 patients were more likely to have a peripheral (60.5% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.001) and bilateral distribution (72.3% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001), patchy consolidations (45% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.021), ground glass opacity (GGO) (94.2% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.011), crazy paving patterns (55% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001); but less likely to have centrilobular nodules (15% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), pleural effusion (3.3% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.032), multifocal consolidations (7.5% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.003), and random distribution (1.7% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: There were significant differences between the CT patterns of patients with COVID-19 and other atypical pneumonia. The presence of patchy consolidations, GGO, crazy paving patterns with typical peripheral, bilateral distribution, and absence of centrilobular nodules, pleural effusion, and multifocal consolidations may help to differentiate COVID-19 from atypical pneumonia.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

1.
Çıvgın E, Parlak İzzet S, Güneş YC, Bahadır GK, Karalezli A (2023) Computed tomography findings in COVID-19 and atypical pneumonia: a comparative study. J Infect Dev Ctries 17:1063–1069. doi: 10.3855/jidc.16698

Issue

Section

Coronavirus Pandemic