Distribution of vectors and arboviruses, and healthcare workers’ knowledge of vector-borne diseases in Armenia

Authors

  • Lilit Babayan National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Yerevan 0025, Republic of Armenia
  • Arsen Manucharyan National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Yerevan 0025, Republic of Armenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-0005
  • Lusine Paronyan National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Yerevan 0025, Republic of Armenia
  • Haykuhi Vardanyan National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Yerevan 0025, Republic of Armenia
  • Ruben Danielyan National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Yerevan 0025, Republic of Armenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-3625
  • Gayane Melik-Andreasyan National Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Yerevan 0025, Republic of Armenia
  • Jenna E Achenbach Battelle Memorial Institute; Charlottesville, VA 22911, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-6413

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18058

Keywords:

vectors, arbovirus, mosquitoes, Armenia

Abstract

Introduction: Armenia’s favorable geographical and climatic conditions support mosquitoes, sandflies, and ticks that can transmit various diseases. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of these vectors and circulating arboviruses in Armenia and assess healthcare workers` knowledge of arboviral diseases.

Methodology: In 2021, we conducted fieldwork, combining morphological identification of vectors with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of pathogens to map the distribution of potential arbovirus vectors across Armenia.

Results: Our entomological surveys identified four mosquito genera—Anopheles, Aedes, Culex, and Culiseta—comprising 20 species; and 11 species of Ixodidae ticks. Culex pipiens was found in all 11 regions, while Culiseta spp. was absent in Ararat Province. PCR testing of mosquito and tick samples revealed Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in 13 tick samples, but West Nile virus (WNV) was not detected in mosquitoes. Specifically, 13 out of 525 Ixodes tick pools tested positive for CCHFV; the positive samples originated from Hyalomma marginatum ticks in Syunik’s Sisian region. None of the 11 pools that contained 473 Cx. pipiens mosquitoes tested positive for WNV. Analysis of questionnaires from 499 healthcare workers showed that epidemiologists, infectious disease specialists, and family doctors had greater awareness of arboviral diseases than other specialists. However, there was a low rate of sample submission for laboratory diagnosis and confirmation.

Conclusions: The extensive presence of vectors combined with limited knowledge of arboviral diseases complicates disease understanding in Armenia. Strengthening the surveillance system through training and improved sample collection is essential for disease monitoring and public health interventions.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Babayan L, Manucharyan A, Paronyan L, Vardanyan H, Danielyan R, Melik-Andreasyan G, Achenbach JE (2024) Distribution of vectors and arboviruses, and healthcare workers’ knowledge of vector-borne diseases in Armenia. J Infect Dev Ctries 18:1442–1449. doi: 10.3855/jidc.18058

Issue

Section

Original Articles