A study of the risk factors for Ureaplasma urealyticum infection and the predictive role of immunoinflammation

Authors

  • Yanhui Li Tangshan Fengnan District Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
  • Jie Zheng Tangshan Fengnan District Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
  • Junpeng Zhao Tangshan Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
  • Wenjie Qi Tangshan Maternal and Children Health Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
  • Yuhong Yao Tangshan Maternal and Children Health Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
  • Dongxue Gao Tangshan Workers' Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China
  • Jinyin Yan Tangshan Central Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People’s Republic of China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.19723

Keywords:

Ureaplasma urealyticum, biovars, serotypes, subtypes, immunoinflammation

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increasing awareness on the prevention of Ureaplasma urealyticum (Uu) infection, the high-risk factors responsible for infection in female patients in China are yet to be determined.

Methodology: The study included 3043 Chinese women. Cervical secretion samples were collected for Uu identification.

Results: Higher age groups (25–30, 30–35, 35–40, and >40 years) had a higher risk of Uu infection (OR = 1.46; OR = 1.51; OR = 1.71; OR = 2.49, respectively). Being literate, and use of intrauterine device (IUD), or other contraceptive methods could reduce the risk of Uu infection (OR = 0.64; OR = 0.79; OR = 0.76, respectively). Women with low level of cleanliness or promiscuous behavior had a higher risk of Uu infection (OR = 1.42; OR = 1.41, respectively). Among the Uu-positive patients, 66.84%, 24.81%, and 8.35% were infected with biovars 1, 2, and coinfection. The predominant subtypes were S6 serotypes (28.91%) in biovar 1 and S2` subtypes (62.73%) in biovar 2. The possibility of S1 + S6 infection was lower than that in S1 patients (OR = 0.529). C-reactive protein (CRP) and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) could be used to predict Uu infection (area under curve, AUC = 0.55; AUC = 0.68, respectively).

Conclusions: Uu-positive patients were infected with two biovars and multiple subtypes. Age, method of contraception, cleanliness, education level, promiscuity, and subtypes of Uu were factors influencing Uu infection. CRP and SII provide a new strategy for clinical diagnosis of Uu infection.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Li Y, Zheng J, Zhao J, Qi W, Yao Y, Gao D, Yan J (2024) A study of the risk factors for Ureaplasma urealyticum infection and the predictive role of immunoinflammation. J Infect Dev Ctries 18:1883–1890. doi: 10.3855/jidc.19723

Issue

Section

Original Articles