Scrofuloderma: report of two cases

Authors

  • Dusan Skiljevic Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-487X
  • Maja Vilotijevic Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2611-8669
  • Jelena Stojkovic Filipovic Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
  • Vesna Reljic Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
  • Marija Tomanovic Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-2319
  • Jelena Peric Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6088-094X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.21136

Keywords:

scrofuloderma, Mycobacetium tuberculosis, cutaneous tuberculosis

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic, granulomatous, infectious disease caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Cutaneous TB accounts for less than 1–2% of all TB cases. Scrofuloderma is a subcutaneous form of cutaneous TB, which results from direct spreading of infection from deeper tissues.

Case reports: We present two patients with scrofuloderma who exhibited typical clinical features but posed significant diagnostic challenges. In the first case, diagnosis was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of a tissue specimen which detected M. tuberculosis. All other microbiological tests, including direct microscopy, acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial cultures, and TB-PCR of caseous discharge, were negative. In the second case, M. tuberculosis was identified via PCR of an ulcer swab, while other tests were negative. Histopathological findings were consistent with cutaneous TB. Both patients were treated with four first-line antitubercular drugs. The first patient developed progressive leukopenia and neutropenia and the treatment was adjusted to exclude ethambutol. Both the patients showed significant clinical improvement shortly after starting therapy.

Conclusions: Cutaneous TB is often misdiagnosed due to its rarity and the challenges of microbiological testing, especially in paucibacillary forms. Histopathological features, though suggestive, are not pathognomonic, contributing to diagnostic delays. Increased awareness among dermatologists can lead to earlier diagnosis and better outcomes.

Author Biographies

Dusan Skiljevic, Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

Associate Professor, Faculty of medicine, University of Belgrade

Head of the male department, University Clinical center of Serbia

Maja Vilotijevic, Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

Medical doctor

Jelena Stojkovic Filipovic, Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

Associate Professor

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

1.
Skiljevic D, Vilotijevic M, Stojkovic Filipovic J, Reljic V, Tomanovic M, Peric J (2025) Scrofuloderma: report of two cases. J Infect Dev Ctries 19:168–173. doi: 10.3855/jidc.21136

Issue

Section

Case Reports