Cryptococcus neoformans and PLWH: the role of serum cryptococcal antigen screening

Authors

  • Özlem Gül University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-0157
  • Nazife Duygu Demirbaş University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ayşe Barış University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Okan Derin University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ceren Atasoy Tahtasakal University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Ahsen Öncül University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Dilek Yıldız Sevgi University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey
  • İlyas Dökmetaş University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.21389

Keywords:

Cryptococcal meningitis, antigen, CrAg, screening, HIV

Abstract

Introduction: Serum cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening is crucial for early diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. This study presents the results of CrAg screening among people living with HIV (PLWH) followed in our clinic over the past six years.

Methodology: Patients with a CD4+ T cell count below 200 cells/µL who were tested for CrAg were included in the study. Data regarding age, gender, comorbidities, CD4+ T cell count, HIV RNA level, blood culture results, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings—including CrAg, microscopy, culture, and PCR—were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistical methods were used for the analysis.

Results: Serum CrAg testing was performed on 99 patients, nine of whom tested positive. Among the patients with positive antigenemia, four were diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis. In two cases, serum CrAg positivity was interpreted as false-positive due to the absence of clinical or laboratory findings consistent with cryptococcal infection. One patient died shortly after the CrAg test and could not be further evaluated. Two patients were lost to follow-up; however, one of them presented with symptoms two months later and was diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis. Additionally, there was one patient with confirmed cryptococcal meningitis despite an initial negative serum CrAg result.

Conclusions: CrAg positivity may be detected during the asymptomatic phase of cryptococcal infection. Although current guidelines recommend serum CrAg screening for individuals with CD4+ T cell counts below 100 cells/µL, the detection of positive results in those with CD4+ T cell counts above this threshold should also be carefully evaluated, considering the possibility of false-positive or false-negative results.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

1.
Gül Özlem, Duygu Demirbaş N, Barış A, Derin O, Tahtasakal CA, Öncül A, Sevgi DY, Dökmetaş İlyas (2025) Cryptococcus neoformans and PLWH: the role of serum cryptococcal antigen screening. J Infect Dev Ctries 19:1560–1565. doi: 10.3855/jidc.21389

Issue

Section

Original Articles